Fun Home

Jun. 23rd, 2024 01:59 pm
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
Happy Pride!

Fun Home is a great time; I was mostly familiar with Ring of Keys and knew I'd have to watch it eventually.

Probably Ring of Keys will continue to be the one song I really come back to from this musical, but I really enjoyed the setup of Small Alison (8 years old), Medium Alison (college age), and Alison (in her 40s) who gives commentary on her younger selves.

I watched this kind of distracted and tired so not much else to say but funny to me that with Fun Home and Falsettos and Rakugo Shinjuu we are 3 for 3 on a woman getting a sick solo about her gay* husband and how her gay husband is ruining their lives with their gay lover.

shrimpchipsss: (Default)
aAnother Sondheim! Another late musical; this was supposed to be for May.

I was going to watch a slime tutorial bootleg for this but I'm gonna be real with you I cannot be bothered. I know this is a beloved and lauded musical but it just isn't really sticking with me, the musical motifs are employed very nicely but they're just not to my taste I think.

The premise is about three friends who grow apart as fame and success take the place of genuine connection. Told in backwards order which I should be a sucker for seeing how obsessed I am with The Last Five Years. Maybe Sonheim's musicals are just a bit hit or miss for my taste in melodies? Because I do prize melody above all else.

Jason Robert Brown (The Last Five Years, Parade) is I think a musician who is particularly good at melodies. Mitski and PUP are also standouts. I thought my love for PUP meant that I loved pop punk as a genre but really it's just that their melodies are so clear and a cut above the rest (and also that I enjoy pop punk). It's just that Mitski sees melody clear in her mind, as an old YouTube comment put it.

It isn't that Sondheim is bad at melodies, I actually think he does really unusual ones. There's this thing where if you've listened to music for long enough you can kinda guess the note (or the options of notes) that's going to come next in a song if it was going to resolve the phrase in a typical way. Sondheim though tends to surprise. Here is an interesting YouTube video about some of the music theory behind why Sonheim's melodies are so interesting. It's something that when it's to my taste (Company) fills me with total delight, but when it isn't, or the motifs are almost overused (Into the Woods), I tire of it.

Merrily We Roll is on Broadway and has won a bunch of Tonys. A week before the Tonys I looked up ticket prices just to see and the cheapest seats available were $350. Post-Tonys I've heard the cheapest seats available are in the $400s. HP markup plus the Tonys markup.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
I am behind, this was meant to be April’s musical. This was sick.

Ang Larawan takes place in Manila in 1941 with WWII and the Japanese invasion looming and centers around the struggle to hold onto a grand house that used to host soirees. The sisters Paula and Candida struggle to pay the bills and care for their father, a renowned painter who has been confined to his room after an accident.

They are haunted by a famous painting their father made for them titled A Portrait of the Artist as Filipino which depicts an old man on a young man’s back with a city burning in the background (Aeneas carrying his father Anchises as Troy burns). Reporters and gawkers flock to the house to see the painting but the sisters cannot bear to sell it even though that would help them secure their futures.

The music is haunting, sweeping, soaring and the conflict between Paula and Candida as they try to figure out what to do to survive is awesome to watch.

Some things:
  • A poet who has become a politician
  • A crowd of socialites shows up to gawk at the painting and when asked to interpret it, a woman who has lived in new york city offers no interpretation and jumps straight to how the painting can be turned into merch (an evening gown). Fucking typical!!
  • The older siblings are eager to sell the house and walk around making claims on the furniture and dishes and also on Paula and Candida who can come be their live-in maids :’(
  • The sense of scale of the Philippine peso in comparison to the American dollar as various siblings and friends flaunt (always foreign! always some American!) buyers for the house and the painting. I was almost rooting for them to sell it to the politician just because of the tragedy that all of their father's paintings were in Spain and Italy, but that wouldn't have felt right either
  • Throwing a grand party and filling the grand old house with people and music again as war looms, very Sound of Music, is this just what people do when it feels like you’re going to lose everything, like how neoclassicism gets a revival every time people get anxious about cultures of excess?
  • I'm just thinking about the opening of the movie again which starts with a crackly, static-y song, Intramuros, and black and white footage which bursts into color, and the crackle and static pulling back into clarity. There was a feeling of being transported through time and it made me think of how black and white photographs of the Civil Rights movement make us think that those events happened long ago when it was only some decades past
  • I have noticed that specifically with music that is in languages I don't know, I keep forgetting that I don't know what the characters are saying and neglecting to read the subtitles so that I can watch their faces. I never get confused like this with dialogue! Only with singing!
Thank you [personal profile] pineapplekita  for the recommendation!

shrimpchipsss: (Default)
(Spoilers for the manga)

I finished reading Nana and have been riding the sense that there is no future for the characters.

No future because the story is cut short by Ai Yazawa’s health and the manga’s hiatus since July 2009. No future because the story ends with the death of Nana’s boyfriend, Ren. No future because the structure of the story is a recollection of the events of Nana and Hachi’s lives when they were 20 years old, with flash forwards to the present day. No future because the last chapter (and Ren’s death) is the defining moment that gives context to why the flashforwards have had an overhanging desolation to them.

I’m not sure how much of this was planned leading up to Ai Yazawa’s hiatus but there’s something kind of elegant about the anime ending with the first flash forward and the manga leaving off when we reach the schism that divides the story that is being retold and the repercussions to the years-later “present day.”

The “no future” feeling got me to finally read (skim and listen to some lectures and interviews about) No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive by Lee Edelman which I’ve been meaning to get to ever since [personal profile] x_los ’ fic In Service.

Basically, the theory posits that queerness, being assumed to preclude biological reproduction, and definitely not fitting the model of the hetero nuclear family, is punished by society and that queer people should embrace not existing for the sake of reproduction and furthermore embrace the death drive and jouissance as a radical politics.

It’s an interesting concept; it gives a bit of meat to the usually annoying r/childfree thing. But we still live in a society? Some queer people want or have children? Refusal can be radical; surely this is a freeing concept for those who don’t want children, and I enjoy that his alternative is basically hedonism, but it is a fairly introspective politics and has the potential to be antisocial. Which is fine, but I’m not alone in finding this frustrating. A peek at YouTube comments shows that people hate this guy, and it was very funny to find out out from my friend Zoe (miss_coverly) that he gets criticized, particularly by poc and queer theorists, for embracing a very insular idea of antisociality and rejecting the world, which is a form of privilege in itself.

The usefulness of this theory as a base for your personal politics aside, what I find it EXTREMELY FASCINATING for is in considering Nana’s characters and their reproductive decisions.

1.
Whether or not to keep her and Takumi’s baby is a pivotal plot point for Hachi’s life and one that is contrasted by Nana refusing to have Ren’s child when it appears that Ren would like to have one with her. Both women’s decisions cause all kinds of interpersonal issues that trap and free them in different ways.

For one, when Hachi decides to keep her baby, Nana freaks out and tries to maneuver things so that her homosocial triangle conduit Nobu will take responsibility for the baby, thus tying Hachi and the child closer to her. Nobu rejects this plan and criticizes her, saying that if she wants the child so badly then she should be its father, which of course she can never be.

This is one of the tragedies of the story—Nana who does not want to be the mother of Ren’s child but does want to be the father of Hachi's child. Nana who is gender nonconforming and handsome and brash. Her desire to protect and care for Hachi’s child is queer, since Nana and Hachi are both women, and colored as ridiculous to other characters like Nobu, which fits right in with Edelman’s observation that sexualities that are seen as not conforming to the (re)production of the established social order are identified as threats to the social order.

This goes for Nana’s personality as a woman as well. She is Takumi’s foil—both of them are controlling, domineering, and harsh, and both try to exert their will over Hachi, but Nana is punished for her actions because they threaten the cisheteropatriarchal social order while Takumi is rewarded for being an assertive man.

Basically, there is no future for Nana. Her desires are incompatible with reproductive futurity. She is a cis woman and attracted to men, but she can’t create a future for herself within the script of the dominant social order. All that is left for her is to imagine or yearn for death. This is echoed in the recurring refrain where Nana asks Ren, “Hey Ren, if I died, would you die with me?”

2.
Let’s get into Nana and Ren’s relationship which over the course of the manga slowly falls apart even though they clearly love each other. For the first two years of their relationship, Nana and Ren were in the band Blast, which Nana continues to be the frontwoman of. Ren eventually leaves Blast to join the band Trapnest in Tokyo, abandoning Nana until they reunite in Tokyo and rekindle their relationship.

For a while it appears that the two of them will try to make things work even as Blast rises to become Trapnest’s rival, but during one of their fights, Nana yells at Ren not to write music for women that aren’t her.

Recall that Ren seems to want to have a baby with Nana. She rejects the idea due to her concerns about becoming unable to pursue her career as an artist, not having a motherly instinct, and having unresolved trauma from her own mother abandoning her, and continues taking birth control to avoid getting pregnant.

Edelman talks about how in a social order that is trying to reinforce itself, sex divorced from procreation is seen as meaningless and the way that the Child, and the mere possibility of the Child is a symbol of hope, redemption, and a future (13). I believe that this is true of Ren in the sense that a child would tie him and Nana together. I don’t think that he even specifically wanted to be a father but that he longed for proof. After all, he continued to wear the necklace that Nana locked around his neck (Sid Vicious reference) even when they were broken up and he was alone in Tokyo. And he proposes to her out of the blue right as their bands are putting out competing new releases and things are only becoming more chaotic.

There’s a sense that Ren was desperately trying to lock down the few “stable” things he had to hold onto at the time. Which brings us back to Nana’s freakout over Ren writing music for Reira and not for her.

I think there's a connection between reproduction (having a child) and creative production (songwriting) in their relationship. Their relationship started with them making music together, but now they are in different bands. And since they won’t have a child, and their marriage paperwork keeps being delayed in part due to Nana’s murky family situation, Ren begins grasping for some way to anchor him.

In the absence of some kind of stability or hope for the future, there is the death drive. At one point, Ren tells Reira that he wishes he could kill Nana so that she could be all his. You already know about Nana asking Ren if he would die with her if she died. Ren also chokes Nana during sex using her leather choker to the point that she blacks out which is doubly wild because Nana is a singer who needs to protect her voice. This is a het couple but that is a perfect encapsulation of Edelman standing up for queer people having nonreproductive sex and the way the death drive and jouissance are intertwined.

3.
The whole time all of this is going down Ren has some pretty destructive coping mechanisms. Since moving to Tokyo, he’s developed a drug addiction which alarms the people around him who know of it and, finally, Ren himself.

Edelman clarifies that the point of embracing the death drive is not the death drive itself but rather the disruption of the status quo via the refusal of reproduction as the only way of being (17). Unfortunately for Ren, he embodies the death drive not being chosen out of resistance but of being inevitable due to despair. I know it’s not a 1:1 but I find the dichotomy between [reproductive futurity] and [the death drive] interesting.

He is constantly isolated or on tour with his band members who he has codependent relationships with. His addiction is being fueled by one of the directors at his band’s company and is beginning to affect his motor control. And his relationship is at an impasse: no marriage, no music, no children.

As their issues mount, Ren avoids Nana out of shame, intending to get clean before seeing her again, which is quite a future- and hope-oriented intention despite how simultaneously self-sabotaging and avoidant it is. In a fit of inspiration and encouragement from Hachi, Ren finally decides to drive to see Nana for her birthday and crashes his car into the apartment he and Nana shared when they lived together. Call that a death drive.

4.
One last example before I close this out is about the Child:

“The Child… marks the fetishistic fixation of heteronormativity: an erotically charged investment in the rigid sameness of identity that is central to the compulsory narrative of reproductive futurism” (21).

There’s a whole other post that could be made about Hachi being a closeted lesbian who nevertheless caves to the pressure of comphet and also her own desire to be a mother (see her groupie relationship with Blast and her mother-son dynamic with Shin). But I think the compulsoriness of reproductive futurism and the way it actually operates as both hope and despair is extremely applicable here.

In an interview with the Dissenter, Edelman refers to reproductive futurism as a type of becoming that is actually a repetition of our being which actually prohibits a different future from happening.

Consider how Hachi and Takumi’s son is named Ren, and how their daughter Satsuki was named by adult!Ren before he died. And the way child!Ren looks just like Shin, who Takumi persecuted for having a romantic relationship with Reira while he was underage. The way Satsuki has a crush on Shin to boot. And child!Ren is the only person Reira will sing for after she tried covering for adult!Ren’s withdrawal symptoms right before he died by faking an illness and announcing that she was going to reevaluate the purpose of her voice. She was willing to stop singing for adult Ren, and to sing again for the child Ren.

History repeats itself; all we can do is reproduce what has already been!!



Btw I also talk about Nana in my Yuri Zine essay, and so does my friend Zoe (miss_coverly) who helped me edit this!

Sources:
Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Duke University Press, 2004. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Edelman_No_Future.pdf
“ENG 201 (Lecture 8.3): More on Edelman and Futurity.“ YouTube, uploaded by Benjamin Hagen, April 27, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0C9GkAo6w.
“#715 Lee Edelman - No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive.” YouTube, uploaded by The Dissenter, December 9, 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-kg4QRa3lc&t=2384s.

shrimpchipsss: (Default)
This is a perfect movie musical. to me.

Funny coincidence to choose it for March and watch it during holy week but I wanted very urgently to understand Pio's insistence that some of the songs work really well for chengxian.

It's so nice seeing human beings look like human beings in a movie. These hippies were so sweaty and gritty and glowing, like you could reach out and touch them. The world pre- "Everyone Is Beautiful and No One Is Horny." 

This is yet another musical or play adapted into a movie where they make nods to this being a production of a book or a musical or a play in the movie. Like Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat with the actors shown in their civilian clothes or Joe Wright's Anna Karenina with the moving set pieces.

With Jesus Christ Superstar, they decided to intentionally keep certain anachronisms as parts of the set; people selling guns and grenades and postcards at the temple market, Judas running from a row of tanks, guards carrying swords and spears but also machine guns. It's really evocative of [literally any conflict in the Middle East since the US has been fucking things up in the region for oil and power since like WWII]. Unfortunately it does not matter when you watch this movie for it to feel relevant in this aspect. Appreciated the nod to the US being the new Rome. One empire for another.

I'm obsessed with the Mary - Jesus - Judas love triangle, and also white Jesus and Black Judas, incredible choices going on here and really cool depiction of Judas wanting Jesus to come to his senses and not get swept up in the cult of personality forming around him.

There is something so comfortingly crinkly about the style of the music and its recording. I grew up listening to my dad's music which was a lot of Elton John and a lot of stuff from the 70s so there's a feeling of familiarity there. I also just like rock operas I think? Queen's A Night at the Opera was one of my favorite albums as a high schooler.

I recommended the movie to people at my church today citing that it was camp and felt very queer and that the humanness of Jesus felt incredibly poignant. Feeling very lucky for my beloved queer church this Palm Sunday.

No other notes. I long to watch a screening of this at a movie theater.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
This was the musical for February, another Sondheim one! Watched the 1991 movie with Bernadette Peters whose name I didn't know before but I definitely know now.

Into the Woods takes a bunch of well known fairy tales and weaves them together into one with the characters all tumbling into each others story lines. It's hilarious and really well written and also THE LONGEST MUSICAL EVER.

A lot of musicals are 2.5 hours long but you feel every minute of it with this one. One theory I have is that it's because it is not an opera, there's dialogue in between each song so you can't just ride the continuous never-ending thread of melody. I tend to listen to musicals first before watching a pro shot (or a bootleg slime tutorial) or movie but this musical was a bit incomprehensible to only listen to because you miss out on important plot stuff that only happens in dialogue. I think I personally prefer operas to song-dialogue-song-dialogue so there is that also.

But in addition to that, Into the Woods goes REALLY HARD on repeating musical motifs. This might be one case in which the repetition is done so frequently that you feel like you're stuck in a time loop. Maybe this is intentional and a statement about the cyclical nature of fairy tale stories? But it's maddening.

Chris who played piano for a school production of the show agreed that though it's technically the same length as tons of other shows it is the longest fucking show of all time "it aged me five years in a weekend. it's basically the odyssey." so.

Other notes... loved Mister Wolf. Love that he had an eight pack and that his cock and balls were gloriously, flappingly out. 80s sensibility...... we need her back

Enjoyed the subversion of found family when Little Red Riding Hood is like "I'll be your mother now" and Jack says "I don't want a mom, I want a friend."

I think Little Red was one of my favorite characters for how funny her impetuousness was

I don't think I'll be re-listening to this any time soon but the proshot was an incredible work of performance.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
i've decided to listen to (and watch, if there's a slime tutorial) a musical every month and january was falsettos based on chris saying that if i'm ever in a musical mood I should prioritize it. here is my little book report about it.

premise: 
falsettos takes place in 1979 through the early 80s and is about a family conundrum: marvin, a gay jewish man has divorced his wife trina (also jewish) and left his child jason (also, jewish) for his gay lover whizzer while still wanting the trappings of a picture perfect family. marvin talks about all of this to his also jewish psychiatrist mendel (i realize this bit might not be landing. the opening number of this musical is "four jews in a room bitching") who has recently taken trina on as a patient and is falling for her and breaking like every rule of his job ever by talking about all that with marvin. jason is a little weirdo who plays chess by himself and resists his parents urging him to see a psychiatrist and whizzer is noncommittal and demanding. whizzer reminds me a lot of fanon modern gay man meng yao, cursed statement sorry

hot takes:
not a hot take: this thing fucks. the first several songs are one punch after another. the second act does sort of blur together in my mind before "what more can i say" partway through and the absolutely GUTTING "what would I do?" as whizzer dies from aids—this sort of tonal dissonance is partially due to falsettos originally being two of three separate musicals that were stitched together. but this is a fantastic story about a nontraditional family and their little community (act two introduces the two lesbians from next door)

which speaking of aids, this video essay says everything about how falsettos works as a story about aids while rent fails, which kind of boils down to that falsettos takes aids and death (and relational drama) more seriously than rent does. disclaimer I haven't seen rent, only heard rants, but they and this essay have mostly reinforced for me that rent did important things for the culture but is only really great if you grew up with it

speaking of two lesbians from next door it's so funny to me that from the age of 4 I grew up with two lesbians next door, my next door neighbors [redacted] and [redacted]. chris once asked me if i ever saw in their lives the life I might want to live one day, any kind of a queer awakening a la ring of keys from fun home (which i may watch this year), and I answered that i never did, because they were a white couple and so their happiness or unhappiness, the happiness they were allowed to have had nothing to do with me or what i would be allowed by my family. which is depressing as fuck and there is a lot to unpack there. i was going through it at the time!!! anyways [redacted] and [redacted] got gay married and gay divorced and i'm sort of ambiently sad that it was [redacted] who moved out. she made the best brownies. my family was never really close with them (maybe because my parents are HOMOPHOBIC) but we were good neighbors and even that kind of bare minimum thing still stands out in my childhood memories as a type of script for what neighborhood-based community can be like

which takes me back to how falsettos, like company, is about community and nontraditional family structures. [personal profile] pineapplekita was talking about how falsettos resolves some of the lingering ache that company carries because company is about a single bachelor living in a world of cishet couples. bobby admitting that he needs love (in whatever form that may be) is the triumph of the story but the character remains in a sort of stasis of not being able to realize it, with the addition of the audience knowing exactly what he is up against (detailed out in the rest of the musical). i've written about this already, over here though. falsettos takes all that desire and longing and shows you what it can be. with the overhanging horrors of the aids crisis.

which is why falsettos is like but unlike company, and these two are perfectly triangulated by ang lee's the wedding banquet (1993) which is about a gay couple pretending they are just best friends and that the chinese son is marrying a chinese daughter in law so his parents will leave him alone (they don't)

last little note, i think jason's low level homophobia which is targeted solely at his dad and not at whizzer or anyone else is HILARIOUS. it's about equal to a kid thinking it's gross when their parents kiss. when they say traumatize your parents back...
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
Featuring an imperfect case study using my own fanart.

Toxic yuri had a moment on the ailing Twitter/X app over the summer which is very exciting and [ariana grande equality gif] to see, but I want to put forth some critical thoughts for people to consider as part of the yuri zeitgeist.

Because the toxic (I’m being real broad here, think anger, aggression, etc, not just abuse or manipulation) aspect of toxic yuri is something that is comparatively hard to come by in wlw fanwork as opposed to in mlm fanwork, particularly in wlw femswaps that are derived from mlm media.

[personal profile] x_los wrote a critique on the state of wlw femswaps in MDZS fandom circa September 2020 that I think really gets at the odd loss of athleticism and physical capability as part of the alchemical genderswapping, and the tendency for cis wlw femswaps to be domestic, mundane, and soft when the couple that the genderswap is derived from is blatantly not. It’s the kind of genre or tonal shift that isn’t a Thing on its own but is an annoying trend across entire fandoms, the cozy-fying of athletic, martial ships as you turn them into women, and therefore worth examining.

I’m going to branch off from the [physicality] aspect of this critique into a [violence and aggression] sub branch because it’s interesting to me and I think it has implications on the original argument. Let’s go.

Take for example Lesbingqiu (lesbian BingQiu from Scum Villain). BingQiu are perfectly set up to be angry and fraught and toxic which they definitionally are in the Jin Lan Arc in the story. During this arc, they have an angry confrontation in an alleyway where Binghe chokes Shen Qingqiu against a wall, stops the blade of Shen Qingqiu’s sword with his bare hand, drags Shen Qingqiu up by the hair, and feeds him his blood (x_los has a GREAT angry fraught lesbingqiu fic that takes place during this arc which I highly recommend).

I have also drawn a scene from this arc. Sorry to use my own fanart but like, it’s right there.


As well as a modern AU wlw scene that is spiritually from the same source


Like if you have any visual literacy at all you can see that the two are the same.

But I’ve found that the angry fraught bathtub drowning lesbingqiu is less popular (by a factor of 7x tumblr notes at time of posting) than the angry fraught blood feeding mlm bingqiu.

I think this is partly because it’s a modern AU and so people see it and go “!!! domestic violence!” which is understandably uncomfortable. But fanart of violent modern AU mlms don’t give people the same pause.

Which is where we get into the societal stuff. Men are culturally permitted to be violent while women are not. The book Odd Girl Out by Rachel Simmons is all about the way that aggression among girls is suppressed from a young age which just makes aggression among girls secretive and vicious and insane. There’s a notable study on girls being hushed in a classroom for raising their voices when boys in the same class had been speaking more loudly. Big thanks to [personal profile] pallas_rose for recommending this book to me in our discussion on this topic.

(As an aside, there’s also a weird association between women and violence necessarily meaning that the woman is a victim of violence which is a gut reaction I’ve noted in myself and am extremely suspicious of as it is some gender essentialist shit that would be very nice to unlearn.)

But to get back to girl aggression, which is an actual useful term unlike all the awful and misogynistic “girl dinner,” “girl math” stuff people are peddling these days. Women aren’t allowed to be openly violent or aggressive even though women are no less violent or aggressive. So in society, aggression among girls and women becomes hidden. In fandom, aggression among girls becomes a mythic creature, the platonic ideal of toxic yuri that people keep talking about but which is harder to actually come by.

I think this is because people are uncomfortable with overt aggression (see the bathtub drowning scene) on the one hand, but also can’t seem to come up with good ways of portraying alternate aggression on the other.

Allow me to introduce tshirt’s essay on girl yaoi, which can be found on page 55 in Yaoi Zine 2. This essay differentiates girl yaoi from yuri and provides some interesting alternatives to the sad, defanged lesbians that proliferate in fiction.

Because it isn’t that domesticity or mundanity is inherently less interesting, it’s that people portray domesticity or mundanity in such a way that is entirely about aesthetics and set dressing (COZIFICATION) and has little to do with the characters’ social roles as the women they are supposed to be now. The thing that makes girl yaoi girl yaoi is that it is about femininity and the identity and social roles of the women involved.

Which is a useful thing to consider for genderswaps because genderswaps have to be ABOUT gender (at least if they are going to be satisfying to me). Otherwise what’s the point? Choose any two other already-existing fictional women and write about them. Which, I guess this is a good moment to say that my critique has mostly been about cis wlw femswaps, as femswaps with even one trans/nb partner tend to have something interesting to say about gender and social roles.

I keep getting off track and now I’m angry but like femswap wlw doesn’t even have to be toxic to be compelling or to have something to say! I don’t know, tell me something about how the characters embody their gender! Consider Nana which is all about personal style and amatonormativity and the slow creep of being influenced by someone else’s taste until you become them, or The Handmaiden and the mirroring and identification of self in the other.

Lesbingqiu is perfectly primed for such a situation, what with Binghe needing to be socially respected in order to be a worthy partner to Shen Qingqiu. What does that mean for a Bingqiu that are lesbians, a Bingqiu in which Binghe is making herself in Shen Qingqiu’s image? There is oh so much to explore.

And for those who /want/ to portray the secretive aggression, can’t that play out in the context of social roles and relationally, in keeping secrets and threatening ties and stealing someone’s signature scent, copying their outfits and gossip and haughty looks and betrayal?

For people who want that good wlw media, tshirt and I compiled some recommendations from people based on enjoying The Handmaiden and made it into a zine. I’ve taken a few of the recommendations and they have been excellent.

Disclaimer: this wasn’t really a critique on the state of Lesbingqiu fic, my frustrations with them are that I am not a writer and I wish I could write the modern AU fic where Binghe steals Shen Qingqiu’s taste and mannerisms and social positioning to become the best girl. It’s girl yaoi. It’s transgender allegory. It’s everything idk
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
This essay exists in a pocket universe off of the previous one because I started analyzing Shen Qingqiu and got carried away from my main point. I just really need to tell you about homosocial triangles.

We leave off with this: how was Shen Qingqiu supposed to know that the rules of homophobia and heteronormativity would not apply in the world of PIDW? Well, because PIDW was a male power fantasy stallion novel.

In his new transmigrated life, Shen Qingqiu spends years “shipping” Luo Binghe with the wives Luo Binghe would have had in PIDW, sublimating his care for Luo Binghe into encouraging him to pursue the women, notably Liu Mingyan (best girl). Shen Qingqiu’s heteronormativity-poisoned and blinded-by-hubris-about-genre-savviness brain can only comprehend male-male desire within a structure of institutionalized social relations that are carried out via women—in this case, via marriage and matchmaking (Sedgwick, 35).

By positioning himself as a matchmaker, Shen Qingqiu unknowingly slots himself and Luo Binghe into a homosocial triangle, a structure in which a woman is a symbolic conduit by which men seek to cement their bonds, and in which the true partner is a man (Sedgwick, 26).

Here is a chart. The dotted line is Shen Qingqiu’s care and affection for Luo Binghe, and the filled-in line is that care and affection sublimated into matchmaking.




This is all subconscious of course. Shen Qingqiu’s feelings for Luo Binghe when he is under his care are of mingled fear over Binghe’s future potential for revenge, favor towards his once-favorite-character, and the genuine care of a mentor. If anything, Binghe might be the one resenting that he cannot pursue his feelings for Shen Qingqiu due to continually being triangulated (arguably worse than being simply friend-zoned) into a structure of social relations that Shen Qingqiu sees as legitimate, and which is appropriate for their ages and master-disciple relationship at the time.

Of course, Shen Qingqiu’s mind games get even worse the moment he realizes that Binghe has feelings for him (and that people in this world can be gay at all) and his internalized homophobia kicks into higher gear. He is completely thrown off, flustered and hesitant now that the homosocial continuum turns out to continue on to homosexuality and that all of his actions up until that point can be interpreted through an erotic lens (Sedgwick, 1). He is no longer living in a stallion novel; his love and care have transformed the genre of his world into a BL.

Hilariously, while Shen Qingqiu is under the assumption that he is living in a stallion novel, he is extremely homosocial, no holds barred, an advocate for the brotherly bond between sect siblings, unknowingly charming men around him with his simple kindness and mental rules for the way physical touch is fine and even welcomed (“please go ahead”??) between men because none of it is gay.

But even before his paradigm-shifting revelation, you can tell that Shen Qingqiu has been anxious about the gender and desire stuff all along. He does all of his homosocial triangulation and unknowingly winning at gay chicken with everyone around him while referring to both Binghe and himself in turns with female roles, casting himself as the woman (wife, female lead) pre-revelation of Binghe’s feelings and Binghe as the woman (maiden, schoolgirl) after (tshirt, 66). Such a funny guy.

Enough about that though. I can’t talk about homosocial triangles in Scum Villain and not talk about BingLiuShen.

Liu Qingge, one of Shen Qingqiu’s fellow peak lords and friends doesn’t quite qualify as a tsundere, though he is often misinterpreted as one. Shen Qingqiu saves his life and they spend years engaged in one-sided banter on Shen Qingqiu’s part, doing biweekly meridian cleansing sessions, going on missions together, and playing a likely unintentional game of fetch with Shen Qingqiu’s fans which he leaves all over the place and which Liu Qingge returns to him.

When Shen Qingqiu dies to save Luo Binghe from a qi deviation and Binghe hoards his corpse to try to bring him back to life, Liu Qingge fights Luo Binghe every day for five years to bring the corpse back to Cang Qiong mountain and give Shen Qingqiu a proper burial.

Over the course of those five years, Luo Binghe beats Liu Qingge in every battle, dragging Liu Qingge’s body and reputation for never losing a fight through the dirt. They are locked in a bitter, daily, bereavement flavored fight. What an intricate ritual you have going on there. And would you look at that: it takes the shape of a triangle.




The entire time this fight is ongoing, the object of desire, Shen Qingqiu, is dead and not there. Or he’s there, as a corpse. Do you see where I’m going? Shen Qingqiu is the object of desire but he is also quite literally the object. Can you believe it? They are fighting over his body.

Once again, a homosocial triangle is not quite a typical love triangle. Liu Qingge’s feelings for Shen Qingqiu are a bit more ambiguous than Binghe’s, and it isn’t like they’re fighting for him to accept their feelings since he is dead and thus cannot accept them. There are other potential filial or psychosexual or chivalrous or other miasmic intentions at play. But the desire and the grieving and the resentment, maybe even the identification with the other, are all mingled there.

Here are some excerpts from Sedgwick’s Between Men on this permutation of the homosocial triangle:

In any erotic rivalry, the bond that links the two rivals is as intense and potent as the bond that links either of the rivals to the beloved: … the bonds of “rivalry” and “love,” differently as they are experienced, are equally powerful and in many senses equivalent (Sedgwick, 21).

Also:

The bond between rivals in an erotic triangle [is] even stronger, more heavily determinant of actions and choices, than anything in the bond between either of the lovers and the beloved (Sedgwick, 21).

We see this in our own example. With Shen Qingqiu in the most “object” state a person can be, Liu Qingge and Luo Binghe only have each other by which to determine their actions and choices.

Every now and again I’ll see a comment where people muse that Liu Qingge probably kept Luo Binghe alive during the five years that Shen Qingqiu was dead. Consider the way the rivalry may have fueled Luo Binghe and Liu Qingge in the absence of love and their beloved. It’s a compelling thought.

This triangle is diluted somewhat when Shen Qingqiu returns to the land of the living and joins Luo Binghe, but it continues on in a new form. Liu Qingge gets upset that Shen Qingqiu asks for Luo Binghe when he wakes up after the debacle at Maigu Ridge and declares that Luo Binghe is dead (he isn’t). And Binghe continues to balk at calling Liu Qingge by the appropriate title of martial uncle and dreams openly of fucking Shen Qingqiu on the Bai Zhan training grounds (Liu Qingge’s home if he ever deigned to spend time there). Aren’t they so much?

In conclusion, homosocial triangles fucking rock as a concept. I showed two examples of how they can be applied but they’re quite a flexible and load-bearing framework that can accommodate oh so many scenarios. If you can’t get enough of this please read Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s Between Men. I hope I spread the agenda and that you found my charts as funny as I did.

Notes

As seen in Yaoi Zine 2!

(this is the one I ripped off to write the Chihayafuru and homosocial triangles post)

Works Cited

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York, Columbia University Press, 1985.

Tshirt. “Good Kid, a Scum Villain Essay Zine.” 2022. https://longposter.neocities.org/freudzine.pdf.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
My parents finally believed me the third time I came out to them in a frankly hilarious and homophobic misuse of materialist analysis (it took me having a girlfriend, which, sure, that is a difference in material conditions but come ON). In the years leading up to and since the dawn of this horrific time of my life, I processed my parents’ homophobia by reading tons and tons of fanfiction. As one does.

This has included phases of seeking out queernorm or otherwise un-homophobic, romance-focused escapist gay fanfiction, an obvious space of refuge that focuses on the interpersonal dynamics between characters.

It has also included phases of seeking out realist gay fanfiction, necessarily set in heteronormative worlds and full of all the attendant drama, including, at times, fraught family dynamics and homophobia. While this subtype of fanfiction sounds more obviously stressful to read, I found myself gravitating to it as much as I did escapist gay fanfiction in a textbook case of reparative reading.

Reparative reading is Eve Sedgwick’s answer to paranoid reading, an approach which seeks out knowledge of worst case scenarios at a cerebral and distant arm's length out of fear of experiencing surprise. Reparative reading, on the other hand, surrenders to emotional affect and the possibility of surprise, knowing that it can come in the form of horror but also of hope (Sedgwick, Paranoid Reading, 146).  

Both approaches operate as a sort of narrative-driven exposure therapy and can resemble each other in their repetition and knowledge seeking, but paranoid reading has a tendency to hopelessness and dread, while reparative reading is more invested in drawing out meaning from or even transforming texts into something new and sustaining (Laing, 9). Fanfiction (and all fanwork) can be itself a reparative reading—a transformation of a text—as can be a fan’s approach to reading a text and its fanfiction.

In this essay, I explore escapist gay fanfiction (from here on, escapist yaoi) and realist gay fanfiction (realist yaoi), two subtypes of yaoi narratives which proliferate in different and interesting ways in fanfiction depending on the structure of the canon source material, and the way both subtypes of fanmade yaoi can have a reparative function to the queer reader.

But first, a quick rundown of structuralism and a disclaimer.




Behold my fandom structuralism chart. It is a blatant rip off of the chart in my copy of The Political Unconscious by Fredric Jameson. To understand it, all you need to know is that the base or infrastructure informs and produces the superstructures. The base is material reality, and superstructures are like allegories for material reality. Or the base is an original text and the superstructures are fanwork. Like derivatives and integrals in calculus. And there’s a word for fanwork: derivative.

If we consider this structural model of fandom with regards to fanmade yaoi, we can consider not just aspects of the original canon text, but also things like sociopolitical moments and public attitudes about queer people at the time of the writing of the yaoi as part of the base which will affect the superstructure (for example, the yaoi being set in a heteronormative world, or homophobia being a plot point; the quantity and quality of such instances).

At risk of stating the obvious, you’ll see examples of both escapist yaoi and realist yaoi derived from all sorts of canon sources, be they themselves yaoi or not. I have chosen my examples of media and their respective fandoms to point out that some stories have structural elements that facilitate the proliferation of certain kinds of fic, whether or not they are a queer canonical text.

Haikyuu!! and escapist yaoi

A fandom that I was surprised to see was made up of a staggering majority of escapist yaoi is that of the sports animanga Haikyuu. The fanfiction scene is roughly this: mostly yaoi, a minority of gen fic and hetero romances, and the odd yuri.

You may ask yourself how the hell a completely romanceless story about playing high school volleyball engendered so much yaoi, but this is fandom we’re talking about, and the lack of romance plots in Haikyuu may have actually contributed. Before I get into that, though, let’s set the scene.

Haikyuu is set in our world, mostly in a town in Sendai, Japan and then in Tokyo (with interludes in Rio de Janeiro and California), and is even situated in our timeline, spanning the years 2012-2013 in the main story (with time skips spanning 2016, 2020, and 2021). The geography and temporality of Haikyuu are not concerned with particular social or political moments but are primarily about regional and national competitions and major sporting events like the Japanese V.League games and the Olympics.

While a few characters of the mostly male ensemble cast have crushes or talk about the traits they like in girls, romance is not a central theme to the story. Tanaka goes through an arc concerning the maturing of his feelings for Shimizu from a bundle of shounen tropes to something more serious, and then there’s MikaShou (a rare het canon couple where the girl’s name comes first, at least in English-speaking fandom) but that’s. Really it.

The characters and their development are not wound up in romance, nor in the particularities of heteronormativity. In fact, Haikyuu is basically completely about male homosocial relationships between teammates, mentors, rivals, and partners, without any trace of the homophobia that, if present, would disrupt the continuum between homosocial and homosexual (Sedgwick, Between Men, 1). Despite Haikyuu taking place in present-day cisheteronormative Japanese society, the absence of homophobia in the narrative and minor importance of romantic plot points allows for relationships that are not bound by a friend-lover binary (consider, instead, a new axis of rivals and partners) or encumbered by social attitudes on queer people. It is an easy slide into yaoi that is uncomplicated by the rules of heteronormativity.

To add onto that, Haikyuu is itself generally escapist. It takes place in the well-trodden setting of high school with the familiar beats of coming of age and getting better at a beloved sport. There are stakes but all within the realm of the sport (after all, people don’t usually die playing volleyball). For many fans it is a zone of psychological safety; instances of hurtful behavior or toxic masculinity are always addressed in the narrative which prizes the values of sportsmanship, healthy competition, and care and communication between teammates. For that reason, the ensuing yaoi tends to lean escapist as well.

There is also something about Haikyuu being a shounen animanga aimed at and about high schoolers and tending to have a younger fanbase that may contribute to escapist fic being popular. A quick search through any of the popular pairings will reveal a world full of fluffy fic in well-loved formats: soulmate aus, coffee shop aus, college aus, and so on.

This isn’t to say that such fic formats cannot be realist if a writer opts to take things in that direction. And there are of course incredible examples of realist Haikyuu fic, but there is a tendency in the fandom to focus on the interpersonal dynamics of a ship, sans the effects of heteronormativity. And with a story that is so rich in homosocial bonds and unencumbered by the shackles of homophobia, why not take the chance to write an escapist fic that feels like a natural extension of the canon in its escapism and fly?

MDZS and realist yaoi

A fandom that stands out to me as having a lot of examples of realist yaoi is Mo Dao Zu Shi/The Untamed.

Before I get into it, allow me to try to heed Jameson’s call to always historicize, if personal histories also count. MDZS stands out to me in part because it’s the first fandom in which I encountered yaoi that was not just queer by virtue of being yaoi but also about being queer (and this from someone who started reading fanfiction circa 2008). I do wonder whether this was a coincidence of most of the fandoms I’ve been in being animanga fandoms whose demographics skew younger, my extremely repressed bisexuality, or the swing of the pendulum of fandom being tired of having to contend with homophobia vs. wanting characters to engage with heteronormativity based on sociopolitical as well as fandom moments.

A study comparing Kirk/Spock fic written in the 80s and the late 2000s/early 2010s found that instances of homophobia and heteronormativity decreased in fic between the two time frames (Callis). But while instances of homophobia and heteronormativity have decreased in fic since the 80s, the nature of their inclusion in fic may have undergone a qualitative shift that is not consistently documented across fandom history (rip LiveJournal).

But to go back to MDZS, this is a fandom that has some really great examples of realist yaoi and this, too, is structural.

MDZS takes place in fantasy historical China and its world is cisheteronormative. Cut-sleeves (gay people) appear to not be in danger of being attacked or expelled from society over it (Mo Xuanyu’s exile is attributed to the incest, not to the incest being gay), but the term tends to be used derogatorily. While queer marriages appear to exist in-universe they are not the norm.

In addition, MDZS is about sects organized around gentry families and is thus full of inter- and intra-family drama. Our protagonist Wei Wuxian is an orphan and the ward of the main family of the Jiang sect which complicates everything. Throughout the story, he faces situations such as the conditional acceptance of his foster family being battered into him all his life (particularly by Yu Ziyuan), the threat of judgment and exile from society for his demonic cultivation method, estrangement from his brother and sect, prioritizing the material needs of the Wen refugees above all else, and caring for a child that is not his by birth.

From this I am sure you can pick out themes like adoption, belonging, chosen family, estrangement, conditional acceptance, repression, and importantly, social stakes for being able to act on your feelings, all common themes in MDZS yaoi and themes which, if explored in certain ways, are easily realist.

Take for example, the threat of expulsion from society for heretical practices as an allegory for homophobia. In talking about the performance of gender, Judith Butler defines the abject as the way in which the reinforcing of bodily norms produces a domain of abjected bodies which fail to qualify as fully human (Butler, 540). In this case, the reinforcing of norms around accepted forms of cultivation produces the heretical, which in turn reinforces the acceptable norm. Ironically, it is when Wei Wuxian is cast down into the Burial Mounds (a haunted old battleground, and doesn’t that sound like a domain of abjected bodies?) that he develops demonic cultivation for survival in the first place.

This is not to say that the same themes cannot be central to escapist yaoi, but while escapist yaoi may explore the same themes within the bounds of the relationship between the main couple, realist yaoi explores the themes and the way they societally impact, or even threaten, the relationship between the main couple or the characters’ queerness.

And there is a lot to work with with regards to MDZS characters’ queerness. Wei Wuxian is popularly depicted as bisexual because he flirts openly with women (though you can be gay and still do this as x_los points out in her meta on Wei Wuxian’s orientation). Wei Wuxian spends most of the story in fraught denial over his feelings for Lan Wangji and plays heartbreaking, brilliant mind games with himself to evade this admission up to the last moment.

However you interpret the specifics of his sexual orientation, Wei Wuxian is a classic case of queer repression with material familial and social consequences for being able to act on his feelings throughout most of the story. It gives writers a lot to work with to create realist yaoi in which the characters’ relationships and even their queerness exist in the fabric of a heteronormative society.

SVSSS and realist yaoi and escapist yaoi

And now. The one and only. A story that begets escapist yaoi and realist yaoi that overlap with each other in fascinating ways is Scum Villain’s Self-Saving System, which takes place in a queernorm (big caveat to come) world but has a transmigrated protagonist, Shen Qingqiu. A guy who has. So much weird internalized shit about sexuality and gender.

Since Shen Qingqiu has transmigrated, his parents and the society he grew up in (very online in China, the year of his transmigration is 2014) aren’t in the picture. The world of Proud Immortal Demon Way (another fantasy historical China) which he wakes up in does not have concepts like “straight” or “bent,” but it’s a while before Shen Qingqiu knows this. Because here’s the caveat: PIDW was a male power fantasy stallion (harem) novel. How was Shen Qingqiu supposed to know that the rules of homophobia and heteronormativity would not apply?

In Scum Villain yaoi set in the modern world, his fears about homophobia may materialize, but in yaoi set in the world of PIDW he faces no threat of exile, rejection, or expulsion for being queer. Thus, Shen Qingqiu’s mind games can oddly be a weird fun space of psychological safety for people who are familiar with the very difficult deconstructing he is doing. For all that the mind dungeon of internalized homophobia is real, he can contend with the psychic damage of it in the safety of a world that will not punish him with it.
 
I’ve talked a lot in this essay about how realist yaoi is necessarily set in heteronormative settings, often signified via vectors of homophobia, repression, and avoidance. But I think yaoi can also be defined as realist via how it engages with gender and gender anxieties. And Shen Qingqiu is full of gender anxiety because he is so preoccupied with propriety, role-playing, and what people ought to do (tshirt, 61).

As tshirt points out, “because the possibility of gay life does not even occur to Shen Qingqiu, he instead immediately is determined to fit himself inside a heterosexual paradigm, and as the woman.” (tshirt, 64). This leads to all sorts of fun gender adventures in Scum Villain yaoi, including feminization of male characters and interesting gender swaps in every combination imaginable, covering the full gamut of trans and cis varieties (and you can see tshirt’s girl yaoi manifesto for more on whether this might still qualify as yaoi).

In a critique of genderswap wlw in the MDZS fandom, x_los points out the way some genderswaps fall into the trap of Any Two Guys (see post comments). This is a term of critique of slash fiction where the characterization is so weak and general that you could swap in a different cast of characters and not affect the story. This critique can also be extended to characterization of gender in yaoi.

This isn’t to say that escapist yaoi is necessarily “bad” characterization if it does not engage with a character’s gender or gender issues; engaging with it may simply not be the project of the escapist fic. But I do think there is something to realist yaoi tending to engage with gender in interesting ways. After all, weird gender shit is only weird because of heteronormativity.

So there it is. Scum Villain begets a lot of fic that contain elements of both realist yaoi and escapist yaoi due to its delightfully fucked up mix of queernorm materiality and internalized homophobia.

One last thing before I leave Scum Villain behind. In the opening of this essay I talked about reparative reading as  fans reading fanfiction and taking meaning from it, and also the way that fanfiction is a reparative reading, a transformation, of an original text. Scum Villain is a case in which the reparative reading permutation goes a level deeper: Scum Villain’s Self-Saving System is itself a reparative reading of Proud Immortal Demon Way.

Just when you thought that it couldn’t get more meta.

Escapist yaoi and realist yaoi: different but important parts of reparative reading
Let’s revisit our points. There are realist and escapist fanmade yaoi that are derived from various yaoi and non-yaoi original texts. A reader can seek out both types of yaoi with a reparative approach, doing the same exposure therapy kind of thing that a paranoid reading approach has, except that it is open to the possibility of hopeful outcomes as much as it is prepared to encounter pain.

Realist yaoi is by definition grounded in the structures of the real world (or the fictional world that a fic is referencing), even in various AU forms. Contending with these structures is one way that realist yaoi provides readers with a mirror to reality, which a reader can choose to engage with reparatively and draw out knowledge, affect, and meaning.

Escapist yaoi is less concerned with the particularities of survival in a heteronormative world but is no less substantive, affective, or interesting. It is an example of a magical or romance narrative, as Jameson puts it—a fantasy which aims at the transfiguration of the real world, to restore its conditions to how things should be (Jameson, 110). Heteronormativity and homophobia are not able to be resolved in escapist yaoi, but their very absence calls attention to the conflict in our real world. In studying Philippine popular literature, Soledad Reyes points out the way the romance mode is rooted in the structural features of people’s actual conditions and serves to highlight the contrast between real life and what people would like to happen (Reyes, 176). The same goes for escapist yaoi. It can be read reparatively as a vision of the world to come.

And in a sense we already have more of the world to come. The mere existence and commonness of escapist yaoi is a triumph, compared to the fic landscape in the late 2000s when I joined the internet and when slash fic was still considered deviant. Consider cases of authors against slash fiction, such as Robin Hobb in 2005, or anecdotes of writers feeling that they couldn’t write their slash couple getting together the way they wanted, worrying that they would be censored in forums (Thomas). That writers do not feel the need to censor themselves and can choose whether or not they want to engage with heteronormativity in their yaoi is something to be celebrated.

Closing

Now that I’ve laid out all these points, allow me to poke some holes in them. Escapist yaoi and realist yaoi aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive; elements of both can be contained in a single text. And this may not be a useful framework with which to understand every example of yaoi out there.

I don’t think I need to state that everyone seeks out fic for different reasons and I don’t have any presumptions about the things I got out of reading fic being at all related to the reasons why a writer would write one. Fandom is a gift economy, not one of supply and demand. To have so much fantastic fic out there, with all the work and love it took to write it? We are the lucky ones.

I haven’t been quoting fic in this essay but I do want to leave you with an example that I think thematically goes along with a lot of what I’ve written here.

One of my favorite fraught-family-themed examples of yaoi is Way Home by ao3 user yamabato which is about the OsaAka pairing from Haikyuu. This is a fantastic example of a story that works as an allegory for parental acceptance of a queer child without the character ever being at risk of exile due to being queer specifically (thus, escapist yaoi or realist yaoi? I say it’s a realist allegory but strange how a text can be both). I wrote a short Dreamwidth post a while back about how a bunch of mutuals and mutuals-in-law lost our minds over the theme of the failed son (THE QUEER FAILED SON!!!) and that I think the story resonated so well with people in part because it could be about your life without being about the thing itself.

Sounds like reparative reading to me!

Afterward

As seen in Yaoi Zine 2!

Following a conversation with eggburial and painacotta I have to point out that not every fluffy fic, or fic that is unconcerned with cisheteronormativity, is necessarily an escapist fic.

Just as there is a new type of “cozy [insert genre here]” writing in fiction, some things are so far removed from real world contexts that they are no longer a mirror to the real world but are simply a bunch of vibes, aesthetic with no substance. If true escapism is meant to be subversive it should do more work than just mollify its reader. As Ursula K. Le Guin puts it, “the direction of escape is toward freedom.”

Works Cited

“Any Two Guys.” Fanlore, 10 September 2022, https://fanlore.org/wiki/Any_Two_Guys.

Butler, Judith. “Introduction.” Bodies That Matter : On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London, Routledge, 1993, pp. 531-542.

Callis, April S. "Homophobia, Heteronormativity, and Slash Fan Fiction." Transformative Works and Cultures, Vol. 22, 2016.

Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2014.

Laing, Olivia. “You Look at the Sun.” Funny Weather: Art in an Emergency, New York, W. W. Norton Company, 2021, pp. 7–11.

Thomas, Mel [@pagemelt]. “#BookTok #fantasybooktok #fantasybooks #robinhobb #farseertrilogy #realmoftheelderlings #fanfic #fanfiction #wolfstar #ao3 #hpfanfic ” TikTok, 2023, https://www.tiktok.com/@pagemelt/video/7236388684642143530.

Reyes, Soledad. “The Romance Mode in Philippine Popular Literature.” Philippine Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2, Second Quarter 1984, Ateneo de Manila University, pp. 163-180.

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York, Columbia University Press, 1985.

---. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay Is About You.” Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, edited by Michael Moon and Michèle Aina Barale, Duke University Press, 2003, pp. 123-152.

tshirt. “Good Kid, a Scum Villain Essay Zine.” 2022. https://longposter.neocities.org/freudzine.pdf.

x-los. “Wei Wuxian and Orientation.” More Life, Dreamwidth, 11 April 2021, https://x-los.dreamwidth.org/573325.html.

---. “Chapter 71: Two Lesbians Get Annoyed About the Conventions of Modern wlw Wangxian.” One Where: a Miscellany/Commonplace Book. Archive of Our Own, 2021, https://archiveofourown.org/works/28567293/chapters/74817903.





shrimpchipsss: (Default)
This topic may grow tired for those of you who have read my homosocial triangles in Scum Villain essay in Yaoi Zine 2 (which I’ll post here once the PDF goes live) but I want it for Chihayafuru just like, for the record.

Because Chihayafuru is a shoujosei which, as twt user tshirt3000 put it, reads “more genre savvy than it was probably intended to be simply because all the characters in it are so trope poisoned that they're textually frustrated by the limitations of their role.” The heteronormative structures (the shoujosei genre tropes) are so strong that the characters are trapped and all their funny little issues, impeded by the laws of heteronormativity, have nowhere to go. Which is how you get a classic “which guy ends up with the girl” love triangle that turns out to actually be a homosocial triangle.

For the unfamiliar, a homosocial triangle is a structure in which a woman is a symbolic conduit by which men seek to cement their bonds, and in which the true partner is a man (Sedgwick, 26). This framework holds whether the men intend to strengthen their bonds with each other via cisheteronormative norms, or whether their feelings towards the woman are true or not.




And I do think that both Arata and Taichi’s crushes on Chihaya are genuine and true (and they even do a genre-revolutionary thing of asserting that Chihaya is not just a love object but a person in their conversation about how "Chihaya doesn't belong to either of us"). It is just that Arata and Taichi’s rivalry has a larger effect on each of them and that the emotions they have about each other cover a much wider range than the emotions about their literal actual crush.

Sedgwick describes this very phenomenon:

In any erotic rivalry, the bond that links the two rivals is as intense and potent as the bond that links either of the rivals to the beloved: … the bonds of “rivalry” and “love,” differently as they are experienced, are equally powerful and in many senses equivalent (Sedgwick, 21).

I think a lot of the fandom, even shoujo love triangle truthers, would agree that Arata and Taichi’s Meijin qualifier match and its conclusion was one of The major emotional climaxes of Chihayafuru—a culmination of Arata and Taichi’s jealousy, resentment, rivalry, and longing for connection with each other.

Consider the way Arata agonized over his rivalry with Taichi and whether or not he was a bad friend for wanting to beat him, for viewing Taichi as a stepping stone, for crushing “Taichi’s most pure, most beautiful feelings.” Consider Taichi’s existential "I can't win against Arata even if I spend my whole youth on it” and yet devoting his whole youth to it.

Consider Arata imagining how they first met and how, if Chihaya hadn’t been in their class, Taichi would have definitely called out to Arata to ask him to play soccer, and Arata would never have said “okay,” because he’s only good at karuta, and they never would have become friends.

Consider Taichi, after the Meijin qualifier match is over, thinking that as he was laying the cards down, it was the first time since he started playing the game that he thought of the cards as dear.

More Sedgwick again:

The bond between rivals in an erotic triangle [is] even stronger, more heavily determinant of actions and choices, than anything in the bond between either of the lovers and the beloved (Sedgwick, 21).

The boys’ major emotional arcs are mainly concerned with each other even if it is though their rivalry over karuta and their rivalry over liking Chihaya.

There’s more I’d like to say about Arata’s settled, unbothered masculinity vs. Taichi’s weird hangups and rules about the right way to perform masculinity and also the way arataichi is yuri (ty convo w ingoodjest and fatesteeltaylor).

Some food for thought:

"Allow a simplistic and false dichotomy: if yuri is absence, then yaoi is presence. If yuri is overflowing emotion, then yaoi is thoughtless action. Yaoi is about immediacy, violence, gripping a cute boy by the scruff of the neck and shaking him until he whimpers. The emotions between two women create yuri; the actions and physicality between two men create yaoi" (tama)
 
 
More on this later, maybe.

Works Cited:

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York, Columbia University Press, 1985.

Tama. "Yaoi is for people who bit their peers in childhood." Yaoi Zine 2. 2023.

shrimpchipsss: (Default)
What a gift this book has been to my life.

I read Unmasking Autism late last year on the recommendation of my friend who, like me, is an older sibling to an autistic younger brother who had to go through the now very controversial and at the time new and ‘leading edge’ ABA therapy. This therapy is basically training on how to repress any neurodivergent instincts and fake a neurotypical personality and in its worst forms looks like what training a dog looks like. The therapy was invented by the guy who came up with conversion therapy so you get the picture, he loved to dehumanize people, and to completely neglect what those people actually experience or think and make them comply with society's idea of “normal.”

My friend and I have had long talks about how at a really base level it is a good thing to equip people with the basic tools of knowing certain social scripts because how else do you navigate a society that isn't set up for you? But that the problem with the therapy is that it stops there and fails to accommodate for the neurodivergent person's needs, instead punishing them for not complying to the social scripts that are meant to be a tool and not the rules of existence.

One of the important things the book points out is the concept of the social model of disability vs. the medical model of disability, that it is the failure of society to not be something everyone can participate in, not the medical condition of the individual. This framework is helpful because it’s also about the way no one lives up to neurotypical standards all the time and so these standards hurt us all (same idea as bell hooks on patriarchal masculinity and the way those standards hurt everybody).

I was also really floored by the weird unexpected grace afforded by knowing that people might be subclinically autistic (or insert diagnosis here) so while you might not qualify for a diagnosis you may share enough struggles that you belong in the community. Which is just gratifying bc whether im "ADHD likely" or my brain has just been destroyed by the internet or Both there are more ways I can accommodate myself.

Though the more time passes the more I think I probably have inattentive ADHD, these things run in families after all and ADHD and autism have a lot of overlaps and are referred to as sister conditions (there’s also the whole AuDHD thing I’ve seen online a bit for people who have both). It would explain a lot about my college experience and things like the way I’ve struggled to sleep my whole life. Something about a delay in melatonin production in the brains of autistic and ADHD people?

Anyways. The book is also wonderfully about gender and queerness and race since, you know, autism and social norms, and Devon Price is trans and really works to constantly bring up and center trans and queer people and people of color, and to point out gaps in research and in diagnosing patients, which is Very Nice in a psych book, like such a relief that it is not blisteringly cishet and white.

I recommend this book a lot. My brother read it too and it gave us both a lot of language with which to talk about our childhoods with our parents even if they still don’t really get it. It was one of those books that the entire time I was reading it I kept having the uncanny feeling that my life was being read back to me.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
I was really lucky to watch the limited revival run of Parade this year with my friend who flew across the country specifically to see it live.

Parade takes place in Marietta, Georgia 50 years after the American Civil War and is about Leo Frank, a Jewish man who is accused of raping and killing his young employee, the spectacle of the court case and his wife’s efforts to help him, and the case’s aftermath in the community and the South.

This one is heavy as far as musicals go and it's suffused, and really quite blatant with the reality of antiblack racism and Jim Crow in the post-Civil War South, as well as antisemitism and the way marginalized people are pitted against each other (for example, Black characters who are blackmailed into false testimony, and what choice do they have?).

One of the things about this show, especially the incredible, awful opening number The Old Red Hills of Home, is the way the music simultaneously soars and is menacing in its soaring, and is interspersed with a honestly demented sounding classic American marching band tune. You know, the kind you’d hear in a parade. My friend talked about how the opening number had always been her favorite song but seeing the way it’s not simply a heartbreakingly beautiful song about your home but that it’s being sung by a Confederate soldier, that the song is about the total dissonance of American patriotism changed the meaning of the song for her.

And in a nutshell that is what Parade is about: the way the South has this wretched history and they haven’t dealt with it, and so you need a scapegoat that you can crucify while calling yourself pure and good and an upholder of justice. I gave this summary to coworkers in a meeting the next Monday and my cool older lesbian coworker who is from Atlanta was like yup you summed it up.

Doesn’t it just make you want to scream? Well you’ve got a whole musical soundtrack to do it to if you want.

The way the story ends is the way history goes: Leo Frank is kidnapped from prison and lynched by a mob. The antisemitism of his trial inspired the founding of the Anti-Defamation League. Frank was pardoned in 1986 and the case was reopened in 2019.

One last note, and sorry for the sudden tonal shift here, I knew nothing going into the musical other than that it was written by Jason Robert Brown who wrote the Last Five Years which I’m always yelling at people to listen to the original cast recording and not the Anna Kendrick movie, and I’ll say that man the guy knows how to write a melody.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
A few things I want to remember about the Farseer Trilogy which I started at the beginning of the year.

I said at the beginning of 2022 that I’d start my Diana Wynne Jones arc but that was thrown off by the Queen’s Thief books which is maybe fitting as Megan Whalen Turner is a known DWJ fan. And then I said this again in 2023 but then Robin Hobb.

Man. I love these books. I’m currently on Ship of Magic (the beginning of the subsequent trilogy) which is slow going because I can’t stand hearing Kyle’s dialogue spoken out loud in audiobook form. So jarring to have a bonafide misogynist character, though it really illustrates the social degradation happening in Bingtown in the form of slavery and the patriarchy.

But to go back to the Farseer books. One of the things that I think Robin Hobb does really well is writing disorientation. If you know me you know I love an unreliable narrator (Eugenides, Shen Qingqiu). Now we have Fitzchivalry Farseer. The poor boy’s self perception and self esteem are only destroyed further by elfbark, a substance taken by skill users to give them a power and focus boost which leaves you, frankly, a husk of a person after the effects wear off.

You spend most of the three books hearing over and over again that elfbark dulls your senses and leads to you making bad decisions over time but the magnitude of the warning isn’t put to scale until well into the third book when Kettle reveals that skill users in the golden era of skill coteries would avoid it like the plague.

Suddenly the trudging hopelessness (especially in Assassin’s Quest dear LORD) and Fitz’s blundering is put into perspective. No wonder you’re a shit assassin! Your brain isn’t working at full capacity because you’re drugged up! No wonder everything feels terrible and like things will never be good again, you are in herb-induced depression!

It’s one thing to know about the effects of elfbark but I hadn’t considered how its effects on our poor narrator would temper the way we as readers experienced Fitz’s daily life.

As for non-elfbark related narration though, one day I will go back and reread these books and I will savor the way disoriented perception of events, whether in dreams, in skill visions, or in day to day happenings, are written. As a reader, it’s delicious.

People who know me also know that my favorite stories are ones with great ensemble casts, especially when the writer makes full use of the web of relationships between all of the characters. And this…

It’s so funny. I spent the entire Farseer trilogy thinking that the thing between Chivalry (the king-in-waiting and Fitz’s father) and Burrich (Chivalry’s stablemaster) and Patience (the queen-in-waiting and Burrich’s first love); and between Fitz and his first love Molly and Patience who Molly becomes a maid for and Burrich who practically raises Fitz; and between Verity (Fitz’s uncle and the king) and his wife Kettricken and Fitz, were all super compelling, very very fascinating, just wow the way these characters are acting as avatars for each other from the base of the original erotic triangle between Burrich and Chivalry and Patience.

NEVER did I think that these straight people Eve Sedgwick homosocial triangles would actually FULFILL THEMSELVES??? And maybe it’s because these are straight person erotic triangles that the object or avatar you are pursuing in the place of your true partner gets to turn into a real relationship as in the case of Burrich and Molly, or is forced upon the avatar as in the case of Fitz acting as Verity to Kettricken. Which I have to say is the most fucked up and awful version of this I could imagine.

There’s not much I can add to this other than oh my god??? And if you’ve read the books and were as gutted and awed and grief-horror-mourning-stricken over it all, especially the fucking triangles please let us have a drink together.

Fitzchivalry Farseer and the way that your life is not your own.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
Every now and again I think maybe I’ll write a Dreamwidth post about how people who hate Mashima Taichi don’t even hate him (or like him, for that matter) for the right reasons and then I remember that this post about how people who hate Jiang Cheng don’t even hate (or like!!!) him for the right reasons exists.

This is that post.

The thing about Mashima Taichi, much like the thing about Jiang Cheng, is that he’s not like, the best guy. He can be toxic and jealous, and he’s insecure and cringe and has tons of internalized patriarchal masculinity, and he knows it, is excruciatingly aware of it. Is embarrassed about it, all the time. He is also, like Jiang Cheng, imminently meow meowifyable.

We all know the scene where he downplays Nishida’s win and immediately feels awful about it, comes to Nishida later to apologize. I love Suetsugu and the narrative for doing that. Notice: I love the AUTHOR and the NARRATIVE for depicting it. More on this later.

But I think scenes like this are an example of how people either become part of an apologist camp (he felt bad and apologized therefore he is good and my poor little meow meow, I will disregard his complexity and flaws) or a hater camp (he lashed out so he is toxic and bad, and to go further, the narrative showing him feeling bad about it is Taichi apologism and propaganda). This caricatures things a bit but you get the idea.

A dichotomy like this sounds silly but is propped up by Taichi being trapped in a “which guy ends up with the girl” love triangle, the most interesting part of which is how completely not normal the two guys are about each other. (Have you seen the way Taichi wants Arata’s approval and how he bullies Arata as a child because Arata is paying attention to his crush Chihaya and both of their attention is not on him? Did you see the way Arata agonized over his rivalry with Taichi and whether or not he was a bad friend for wanting to beat him? The love triangle goes three ways, but of course, the fandom will fixate on the two potential het ships).

That aside, Taichi (and Arata, really) is set up to be misunderstood because of Chihayafuru fans' understanding of the story as a love triangle in which people vie for their “best boy” to win.

Which leads us to our thesis.

Some fandoms are set up for people to be at odds with each other, to need to be right due to the structure of the story (for example, a love triangle with a winning love interest). While some fandoms are set up to encourage multiple and more nuanced interpretations of the text (due to, for example, multiple realities or timelines). (credit to chris roxast for the first half of this)

Chihayafuru is a great example of a story that can be interpreted as a love triangle (hilarious, as I think it’s one of the best sports anime of all time and that the romance is secondary) which means that a large portion of the fandom will read the text looking for ways to validate their preferred ship or gathering hints of a foreshadowed endgame pairing (convo w twt user @nyan_wushi, 2023).

Scum Villain, on the other hand, is a great example of a “yes, and” fandom. The text is an meta satirical narrative that ridicules and makes fun of itself and contains multiple realities and timelines, encouraging readers to pose different interpretations of the story and to ask “what if?” over being defensive about being right (twt user @ever_and_anon).

This does not necessarily mean that people in these fandoms will be more likely to consistently and with textual backing characterize their favorite and hated blorbos, but it does make you think.

Because I think there is confusion about whether people like or dislike characters like Jiang Cheng and Taichi for the “fundamental facts of their character” or for their role in the narrative (tumblr user @whetstonefires).

A lot of the discourse from Taichi haters AND Taichi fans alike is about whether or not he “deserves” to have “gotten the girl.” (This has led to some of the most vile and vitriolic behavior I’ve seen in fandom in all my life.) The other common discourse is about his character arc being unsatisfying, which is understandable.

But these things get conflated into “Taichi doesn’t deserve to get the girl because he didn’t overcome his struggles with himself.” “Taichi doesn’t deserve to be with the girl because he experienced jealousy.” and so on. Which is a kind of take I am cautious of as it is the kind of faulty moral panic literary analysis that has become so common these days. Neither love interest “deserves” or “doesn’t deserve” anything and it’s juvenile to think that an author is always trying to make a point about deservingness or moral purity based on characters who happen to be dating at the end of a story when they are 18 years old. I think there are other really good reasons to dislike the "endgame"  but this unfortunately seems to be a common school of thought.

That aside, I think what people are really frustrated about is Taichi's character growth being frustrating and unsatisfying, and it being annoying that a character whose interiority we get a front row seat to is never punished for his actions other than his own self flagellation, and the protagonist happens to ends up liking him.

But these are just things that happen to be true at the same time and not a cause and effect. The "endgame" is simply what Chihaya decided for herself on her own time. But the interpretation of Chihayafuru as a love triangle in which one boy will “win” begets an attitude that overshadows that.

Anyways.

Taichi.

For many who find themselves above the fray of meow meow fundamentalism on the one hand and demonization on the other there then remains whether or not you are satisfied with Taichi's character arc. And here's where I think some of the really interesting divergence in takes appears.

It seems that either people find the frustrating endless cycle of backtracking and doubt to be frustrating, unsatisfying character development, or to find the terrible bad unsatisfyingness to be delightful and interesting.

This occurs likely from the expectation that a character arc should be somewhat linear and that by the end of a story, a character will have worked through some of their issues and be on their way which. Is maybe the expectation of many shoujo and shounen manga readers. But this is neither the only kind of character arc to exist nor should it.

Self-doubt and being trapped in himself is one of Taichi’s defining struggles and the structure of his arc, and it’s really down to personal preference whether you find that satisfying or not, but who said that "good" character development had to be linear or make a character better? It is one thing to say "I found this character's arc unsatisfying" and "this character's arc was bad." 

Regression? Now that’s what I call //interesting// character development.

Which brings me back to Scum Villain and the way some fandoms are characterized by a pursuit of interestingness over correctness. Which isn’t to say that the text is thrown out the window. I’ve found it more common to casually stumble upon more nuanced interpretations of a text in such fandoms because people aren’t as concerned about agreeing and are more open to considering different views and circulating those posts. Seeing a ship or a character they don’t care about or might even dislike and going “not my favorite hentai of pennywise but ok!” and moving along.

I’ll end with this.

Sometimes people hate or like a character for their actual character traits and actions, and sometimes people hate or like the way a character is being used by the narrative. These things get conflated and some fandoms almost provoke that conflation if popular interpretations of the structure of a story are such that people want to be right. On the other hand, the total irreverence and meta narrative of some stories cultivate a collective attitude of freewheeling speculation and theorizing where nothing is sacred and everything is up for grabs. And these things sometimes have more to do with the way fandom develops than with the original text itself.

If you haven't read it I recommend Chihayafuru (top sports animanga of all time next to Haikyuu) with all my heart, both the manga and the anime. For context on Taichi, someone said he's like if you put a Riverdale character back into the Archie comics. I wish that it was a findable retweetable tweet but it was on a private account. I think about it all the time.

If you haven't read Scum Villain and you think you'd enjoy meta satire about a bad porn webnovel, like if that sounds funny to you, you may have a good time. Also if you enjoyed reading TV Tropes as a teen. You might enjoy Scum Villain. Ok peace out would love to hear your thoughts if you want to share them!
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
Was talking with people on twitter about Everything Everywhere All At Once and Asian diaspora movies and the celebration but also miasma of defensiveness around them.

A lot of big Asian diaspora movies follow the same rote story structure common to coming of age/coming out/being a second generation immigrant stories in which there is a family, there are the hopes and dreams the parent has for their child, there is the child's hopes loves and dreams (their queer identity, a career or interest in the arts) which they are terrified their parents will know about and not approve of, the thing is revealed, conflict!!!, resolution (here's a video essay about this). It's a tried and true story structure that works well and which EEAAO is a perfect example of.

The interesting thing in the discourse around EEAAO and Asian diaspora movies in general is the outsized celebration about "breakthrough narratives" that are actually the same narrative structure tons of stories use, and then defensiveness about why these stories are important (though did anyone say that they weren't? do people just want to start fights?).

The defensiveness is interesting though because I think it reflects an abject hopelessness about whether 2nd generation Asian diaspora think their parents are capable of change.

And I get that. These days I go back and forth about whether it is protective or detrimental for me to live assuming that my parents will never accept my queerness. Faatima brought up the harmfulness of assuming that our parents are not capable of change or critical thought. But then there's the lived reality of parents continually deciding that their love for you does not, in fact, override their expectations for your life, or their fear of social shame or exile.

I do think that this defeatist assumption is the reason for the perpetual angst-riddled state of diaspora Asian movies. We are still purging some kind of trauma through our art, and it has to happen, however much it makes me want to physically recoil at times. For better or for worse, this is the question that we are stuck on.

But is it that we won’t get to the promised land of storytelling that is more nuanced about parental/intergenerational issues until all of this shit is dealt with? That can’t be true when we already have movies like Saving Face (2004) which also follows the same simple story structure, and yet with much more nuance. Are movies like that just a fluke of that thing people have said about queer stories in media in the 80s and 90s and early 00s feeling more raw than the mainstream queer media rep we get now because the movies we get now are catering to a mainstream (cis, straight, white) audience.

Which is unfortunately also. something we are trapped in in this moment. The boba liberalism vision of our beautiful political future which is limited to media representation and being understood by white people and assimilated into white culture. Horrific!

Anyways.

Tangential thought about the way diaspora communities can be more traditional and conservative and the homeland because they are holding on so hard to what they see as their traditional values which by then are decades outdated. Which leads to some 2nd generation people being even more traditional or conservative than their parents, which is an actual plot point in Andor. And might contribute to 2nd generation people viewing their parents and culture as more unchanging than they really are or have the capacity to be. Because some of their beliefs are outdated by decades.

This is a mess. No big conclusion. I want more!
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
I am thinking once again about the fic way home by ao3 user yamabato and how a bunch of us (me, many Twitter mutuals, and mutuals of mutuals) lost our mcfucking minds specifically over the theme of Akaashi as the failed son.

I'll preface this by saying that this fic is not about homophobia, the mother even encourages her son to follow the other boy.

But the thread of Akaashi failing to take over the family business, unable to follow his father's path, without the stomach to become a chef, running away from home, semi-estranged, works as an allegory for parental acceptance of their queer children because of the way being a queer child in many Asian families makes you a failed child.

This phenomenon doesn't discriminate by the religion or politics or philosophy of the parents or the child's other shallow markers of success and filial action. A 'respectable' career, appearance, ambition, social standing, doing things like sending money home, are cancelled out by that one thing which has become a personal slight against the parents.

It is not a case of "you are bad and wrong and shameful" but rather "you bring bad wrong shame upon us, you have done this to us." Not just interpersonal emotional death but social death wherein your parents make you their killer and pronounce your sentence: exile. Or make things terrible until you impose it upon yourself. The errant thought that I should read Edward Said.

EDIT: And the slight against the parents is that you have failed to give back what is owed them (another reproduction of the hetero nuclear family).
.
To go back to the fic though. This is a story about a failed son who is not a failure for his queerness. Which is one of the reasons (beyond the plot and the dialogue and the watercolor wash descriptive writing) why I think it may have resonated so deeply with so many people whose family or social/cultural context is like that. It can be about your life without it being about the thing itself.

I highly recommend this fantastic piece writing which haunts me(positive) months later. I hope this little bit of analysis comes off as a giant compliment even if it's more about the fic's reception and how it WORKED SO WELL than about the fic itself. Rest assured that I have waxed poetic to the author about my thoughts on the actual fic.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
For posterity and also because it’s hard to see how you’re coming along in a craft sense when you’re in the thick of it. 
 
I feel like something has solidified in my art overall this year. Notably, I’ve gotten way more comfortable with lines, which is something I’ve been specifically trying to work on over the past few years. I’ve long felt good about my shapes but lines…. the real hard mode aspect of drawing which is yet another reason I’ve so much respect for such friends as [personal profile] pyrzqxyl  and [personal profile] eggburial  who have VASTLY different styles but linework I’m obsessed with. Pyrzqxyl the pixel master with the specificity of a surgeon. Eggburial’s lineart operates almost as a container which is very egg / coffin honestly. 
 
Now to things that are coming along with my drawing. The blocking of characters and general space they take up feels satisfying to me in a way that honestly makes me wonder if I should make a nsfw account to really try to challenge myself when it comes to bodies interacting with bodies. If I did it would have to be on Twitter and not Tumblr where nothing can be deleted in a way that matters. Blocking examples I feel good about here:
  
I did a lot of character work this year, same as any other year. But this year I did character work for series with no official character designs or multiple and even sometimes contradicting character designs. The funniest thing to me is the way artists will sometimes come to the same conclusion about how a character should look even having avoided looking at other fanart (the way I did with the queen’s thief books). I guess there’s something to having a handful of descriptions and archetypes galore and everyone showing up having separately evolved a crab.
 

Said queen's thief characters (link)
 
Comics / sequences. I’d like to keep doing more of them! I don’t know if I’ll ever be insane enough to do a full on animatic or a comic longer than any of these but man is it fun to run with an idea for this long.

The fandom highlight of my year that Megan Whalen Turner SAW much less reblogged this. I think I started approaching consistency with this one and I'm happy with the paneling and use of black space. (link)

If you've read all the way here I hope you've enjoyed the introspection. While I enjoy comments from people gushing over a character or ship, or even the idea behind a drawing, there's nothing that hits quite like qualitative statements about your craft. I'm still riding the high of the person on tumblr who told me at the beginning of the year that they liked my sketchwork. All these months later and it's still one of the best compliments I've gotten all year. I want to do more of that when I comment on other people's stuff too. This was a fun exercise and maybe I'll do it next year!

shrimpchipsss: (Default)
A few times a year I’ll have an existential crisis over why I participate in fandom and why I make fanart and shouldn’t I be working on personal projects? and go through an iteration of the same exact thought process that usually comes back to “I need an un-monetized thing I do just for fun with friends.”

This post is for the next time I enter that spiral and also to talk about fandom as gift economy, which basically encapsulates my greatest hopes and intentions for how fandom should be.

But first, the existential crisis. It usually includes such thoughts as:
  • Hating but also being haunted by the idea that fanart is just practice for my “real” art
  • The nagging annoyance that my fanart is somewhat formulaic and easy and templated  (¾ bust, meme redraw, person floating on a flat color background) I’m not pushing any boundaries or getting all that conceptual, which art isn’t required to be, but like. I can do that. Shouldn’t I show it?
  • But isn’t the point of fanart (and all art) that you might gravitate towards different styles of even “finished work” (character design, animation, background art, 3d modeling, etc. And then painting, drawing, coloring, lineart, etc.)
  • And regardless of the battle of fanart vs. original art, aren’t I at least honing something? I’d never have gotten to where I am as an artist if not for the silly little characters I'm obsessed with.
  • And it’s not like I want to be an artist for my vocation. I want to protect it as a major source of joy in my life and also just the way I am.
  • But don’t I have something to say? Don’t I have original thoughts? Is there such a thing as an original thought? Do I think?
A lot of my recent thoughts on this were sparked by [personal profile] x_los's post about writing, fic, and the publishing world which also introduced me to the idea of fandom as gift economy. I’m also going to steal her idea of reviewing her own writing and want to do a “fanart year in review later” post later; more to come then.

So why participate in fandom?

Fandom as gift economy. In [personal profile] eggburial's words, "theory of surplus value but it's not exploitative." Which makes me think about Richard Gilman-Opalsky's Marxist theory of love which is about how the whole system of exchange value breaks down when you bring love into the picture.  

It's the Elric brothers taking 10, adding 1 of your own, and giving someone 11. There is more to go around because the exchange is not about breaking even but about creation and generosity. And the “adding 1 of your own” to the 10 you’ve been given, which is comprised not just of the original work but also of many other people’s “1 of your own” is intrinsic to fandom with the way fanart and fic is derivative not only of the original source but often of each other—art and fic and meta inspired by other art or fic or meta.

More and more, I’m trying to point out who I’ve gotten inspiration from, other than the obvious fic link. Pointing out someone’s take on a character design or a someone’s post that started the train of thought. It’s obviously about giving credit where credit is due but also a reminder that we’re all in conversation with one another and part of the same (and it feels weird to use this word) economy. I have this idea because we were given the original work and you gave us your thoughts on it.

For better or worse, we also live in fandom bubbles so you may be like me and be 28 and have participated in fandom at some level since you were 12 and never have heard about things like “fandom as gift economy” which was unknown to me until [personal profile] x_los’s post (after I tweeted about the concept [personal profile] virgomoon immediately sent me this post which just proves the point!) which is part of why I’m writing this at all.  

Anyways. I continue to be in fandom and I’m glad to be here even with the looming existential why of it all. I think there’s something to giving my time and attention and the thing that I’m good at to something wholly unrelated to how I make money to pay for being alive. Reclaiming something back from the capitalist machine or whatever. The triumph of getting someone's blorbo right.
shrimpchipsss: (Default)
I first noticed it in 2018 with Sweetbitter by Stephanie Danler and Sally Rooney’s Conversations With Friends, the kind of novel with a young, urban, female protagonist with a dry and overly self-aware internal monologue that made me hate myself a little. 

This substack post on the era-defining trope of “single late 20s-early 30s white women [which] recycles different iterations of the same boring, selfish, reckless, cynical and unmoored depressive figure with a dissatisfying sex life that they organize the rest of their lives around,” says everything I’d want to say and so much more about this archetype. What I want to talk about 


Is that there is a way to write a bitter, wry, self-aware woman who isn’t a dissociated and agency-less spiral of nothingness and despair. 


The reactionary quality of the empty lit fic woman gives her the appearance of a personality when it is really just inertia. Her identity is signaled by cultural items or interpersonal exchanges that create a perfect self-insert vessel to the young urban female reader. 


The protagonist of Severance by Ling Ma (who isn’t white) stands out as having more agency and selfhood than the aforementioned protagonists but is still my favorite example of how lists of the capitalist markers of a person’s life make them recognizable and thus inhabitable to the reader. 


“Me, nothing really weighed on me, nothing unique. Me, I held down an office job and fiddled around with some photography when the moon hit the Gowanus right. Or something like that, the usual ways of justifying your life, of passing time. With the money I made, I bought Shiseido facial exfoliants, Blue Bottle coffee, Uniqlo cashmere.” 


(Longer excerpt here if you’re a depressed yuppie and want to feel like your life is nothing.)


Ling Ma was making a point about the emptiness of life in a capitalist system (to great effect!! That passage eviscerated 2019 me) but a collection of commodities isn’t a person. It’s a starter pack meme or an ad agency’s target audience profile.


The genderbent Bobbi in the recent runs of Company also falls into this non-character-ness, though she is less self hating and more just lost. The buoyancy of Company prevents the spiral, but Bobbi is so reactionary as to still be no one.


It’s all very Newton’s third law. If I were to push the character, the character would push back in equal measure. If I were to push Attolia Irene she’d likely stab me at least.


Three of my favorite books this year followed a theme, the vengeful queen, which kicked off with the Hazards of Love album in January.


Attolia Irene from the Queen’s Thief series, Queen Orual of Glome from Till We Have Faces by C.S. Louis, and Bim from Clear Light of Day by Anita Desai. Characters that have limited choices and ample reason to wallow or dissociate in despair, and are gloriously, viciously, alive.


Attolia (and knowing that Megan Whalen Turner is the biggest Diana Wynne Jones fan I need to dedicate 2023 to the rest of the Ingary trilogy and beyond) even as the walls close in is scheming and plotting for a way out. The diminishing political choices and pressure to take a suitor don’t render her into a passive nonentity, they intensify her grappling with the choices she’s going to make. The situation lays open her regret towards Eugenides, her fear that it is a mockery, the disbelief that he could love her, her shock that she might love him back. Even in her youth, she wears the picture of passivity without becoming it.


Queen Orual might haunt me the most, having convinced her sister Psyche to look upon the face of her lover Cupid because her marriage couldn’t be real, must have been a sham, thus revealing Cupid to be a god and exiling Psyche forevermore. She must bear with what she has done and carry on in grief and guilt. Her becoming the veiled warrior queen is breathtaking. 


Finally, Bim, not a literal queen but holding court over her family household as a teacher and the caretaker of her disabled brother. The sibling who stayed rather than run away with a rich husband or waste away spinning up idealistic dreams of the future. Though a lot of her motivation for staying is duty, there’s richness to her conflict with her sister and the way she conducts herself and the bitterness she bears.


For all that these women appear to share in common with the empty lit fic protagonist, they have substance to them. I’m relieved that archetype is “over,” whatever that means for publishing. How utterly fucking bleak to think that’s all there is to life. Even Miss Havisham, stuck in time and inaction, cut a more interesting figure. 


My descriptions of my favorite books feel insufficient. If I loved you less I could talk about it more. I highly recommend these three books/series which were recommendations to me. Thank you to [personal profile] virgomoon and Faatima, to Lia, to [personal profile] eggburial.

Profile

shrimpchipsss: (Default)
danielle

June 2024

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 10:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios